Friday, June 29, 2007

Callaway TOUR LCG heads, are they real ?

There seem to be a huge amount of Callaway TOUR LCG FT-5 driver heads now available, but are they real or fake ?

Lets look at some some pictures and some info about them..
First two confirmed real pictures. ( no BSG watermark )

Now lets look at a few that are being sold at BSG. These will have the BSG watermark.
Now remember that the "LCD" is a rare limited release and there are more being sold on BSG that Callaway admits to ever being made.


Notice something strange with the BSG watermark BSG special Callaway TOUR LCG FT-5 ?
Maybe a few more pictures will help...


Now a few more from the BSG connection. Why the different color ? Why do they look like they were painted and the letters are crooked ?



If you have questions about this, and I am sure many will...
Just contact Callaway golf and ask.

Corporate Headquarters
Callaway Golf Company
2180 Rutherford Road
Carlsbad, CA 92008-7328

U.S. Customer Service
Mon-Fri 6 a.m. - 5 p.m. (Pacific)
800-588-9836
760-931-1771

CG_Customer.Service@callawaygolf.com

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Plain Stupidity Rant

Regarding the bsg tour dept pricing, anyone who will willingly, and gladly, play upwards of $1800 to $3000 for a "tour issue" (okay, Optifit cart) BSg Tour Dept Callaway driver that's the SAME as the retail "tour" is just plain stupid.  That person may have a college degree...  they may have a Law Degree...  they may be successful businessmen, but if you just throw away money like that to bsg tour dept, you're just friggin' stupid.  In fact, you're MUCH better off buying a retail "tour" because at least it's under warranty.  At least it's not a factory reject that the OEM is just dumping!

I can't BELIEVE some of the prices I saw.  It's unbelievable.

I knew something was up when a buddy told me that some "Insider" had found a post from May of 2006 about R7 460 Tours!!!  And of course...  bsg tour dept gets in a new batch of heads, and then proclaims that he still loves this driver!  Give me a friggin' break.  What a crock!

How about a shootout that is 5 months old!!  Heck, even Golf Digest is MUCH faster and more reputable than that, and they put out a magazine!  What a crock!!

People need a continual reminder and new people need to be able to see the truth about the BSg tour dept.

I know...this may be shocking come from me..  but I thought it was absolutely ridiculous that they
had a FT-5 Tour LCG whatever w/ a TP-7x that costs $2900 and you can add another $250 for a
BSg s-lime coloring to it.

And it's unreal that the BSg tour dept would even THINK about comparing the sh!t that they sell to a Ferrari or Porsche Carrera GT or Ford GT...  real, finely tuned, hand crafted, state-of-the-art machines, that actually not only hold their value, but actually will appreciate.  Friggin' unbelievable.  After seeing in real life a Carrera GT and a Ford GT, if I owned one, and someone compared a rejected "tour issue" driver to my $250K - $500K supercar, I'd have to laugh at them and dismiss it as mindless dribble.

I can't believe the admins on bsg and their tour dept will actually dig up YEAR OLD threads to pump up sales
on OLD technology.  And it cracks me up to see the sh!t-load of ill-fitted equipment in their BST that's been "hit once or 1 round" by people that were fit by the BSg tour dept, only for them to turn around with their 98mph swings that were fitted into x-flex shafts "tipped an inch".  C'mon.  WAKE UP!

What a crock.

Sorry for the rant...

****** As a side note, it seems that the bsg toug dept began several threads last night on bsg regarding the availability of Tour FT-5 and FTi Clubs as being for sale. Coincidentally, the results of a bsg driver shootout posted only this morning showed the FT-5 as having the highest ball speeds in their test.  Tour inventory is available and test results are posted immediately after availability. Coincidence? Random Luck? Great Business? Can you say Paypal?  Some cynics would add that the FT-i is expected to do well in another category.  ******

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

John Daly with Adams clubs ?

As posted on BigStealerGolf, some are saying that big John Daly has switched to Adams hybrids.
Some think it's just another way to drum up business for some un-certified club builders
A picture is all they say about it, but we know what it really means.
TM has no comment, that is a surprise Big John
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Huge update straight from TM !

Why is John Daly using Adams hybrids as reported on BSG when he is a
TM staffer ?

Thanks for the email.

--- TM reply---

Thank you for your inquiry regarding BSG. TMaG will not comment on its
business dealings with other companies. If you have questions
regarding product, please go to

http://www.taylormadegolf.com

Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game.

Best Regards,

Brent

http://maxfli.com
http://taylormadegolf.com
http://adidasgolf.com

--Follow up question---

What does that mean, is Daly using Adams clubs or TM ones ?
Is what BSG posting true or not ?

--- TM reply---

John Daly is using a V-Steel 13 degree wood and Rescue TP 17 degree. If
there is any further questions please contact us at 1-800-888-2582.

Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game.

Best Regards,

Brent

http://maxfli.com
http://taylormadegolf.com
http://adidasgolf.com

--------------------

The Tour Van note in the picture above states the date April 24, 2007 and the Byron Nelson, which is in Irving, Texas. John Daly was playing in Shanghai last week and remained in China, arriving at this week's tourney in Beijing, China on April 21, 2007 to play in a tourney there. An interesting question is why would a tour van sitting in Irving, Texas be making John Daly clubs for use in a tournament in Beijing this week? FedEx must be really fast....

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Real Tour issued HiBores on Ebay ?

With our last Blog we Proved that there is no difference between retail drivers and "tour" drivers and every OEM backed this up.

Now lets look at some BS_g ebay auctions, funny do these tour stamps look different ?
The "TDC" stamped one is from Cleveland ( TDC ) I Like To ROLF
The others look different.

Here is a link to a few of them
HiBore TDC
HiBore Tour

All current BS_g auctions
current BS_g auctions

Pictures are worth a $1000 fitting I Like To ROLF

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Sunday, January 7, 2007

Tour Vs Retail......the Real Deal!

Lets show what some say vs what the truth really is.

From Toad
Ok, there seems to be alot of mis-information online about tour vs. retail. So I started doing a little fact finding from experienced people in the industry that are well know, honest and have credentials. I am also contacting OEMs for more specific information on what each one does. Please remember this is not my opinion but the opinions and facts from people actually qualified. To start off below is the infamous post that is posted on several boards other than where it was originally found. This is not meant to be any type of bashing post but rather a fact finding mission for the general golfing public so please keep your comments as such. I welcome any information from OEM's or actual industry people that can offer honest opinions or facts or members from other boards. Lets keep this clean and see where it leads and what we can find out.
The titanium used in the production of the Tour heads is generally NOT the same as the retail models. It is a very high grade titanium which is stronger and less prone to failure. The average player will never hit 10,000 balls with his driver like a Tour pro will, and thus, has no real need for this quality of materials. It is also more free of imperfections, and much more costly to tool because of the hardness. This grade is mildly heavier, but that is not of great concern because no Tour player plays a 46 inch driver. Just a few grams heavier, which is why you will always see the weight discrepency in Tour and retail heads, even raw and unweighted.
The COG in the Tour heads is almost ALWAYS at a different point than the retail models, generating a mildly lower ball flight and spin rate that most good players desire. There also are NO weight bias' built into the head, unlike retail heads which 99% of the time, have a heel weight bias. This is pretty much true with all Tour drivers no matter what the companies might LIKE the consumer to believe. With a Tour driver, the COG is generally around 2-3mm higher in the Tour head, which results in about 1-1.5 degree of launch angle lower, and 300-600 rpm of spin rate lower than the retail heads. Of course, this can vary slightly.
In Tour fairway woods and utilities, there will also be a mildly higher COG, and either neutral or fade bias built into the COG of the head. 99% of retail fairways and utilities have a heel/draw bias, and generally a more upright lie angle to help the "average" player control their slice.
Of course we all know the face angle is generally square or open on a Tour head, but this is an adjustment made by the Tour department or van, and is really not relevant to any production or internal differences, but is still a difference none the less.
All heads are also tested and conform to the maximum allowable COR.
In terms of Tour irons, most manufacturers will have their heads forged by one of the premium facilities like Miura or Endo for the Tour product, but go with a large mass forging facility in China for the production heads. TaylorMade for example uses Miura to forge the Tour sets, Titleist uses Endo, and Nike has used both in the production of the Tour heads. Tour irons are generally dead on spec in terms of weight. You will not get a Tour set of irons with swingweights all over the board like you do with retail sets. This is because of the quality control at the high grade forging houses. These heads are also nearly free of imperfections both external and internal, and generally have an entirely different feel than their retail counterparts. These forgings are, obviously, higher quality accross the board, and MUCH more expensive to have done than the retail line.
Often time the sole configuration is a bit different as well. Much of the time Tour irons will have a slightly more narrow sole, a blunted leading edge, and more bounce, as the Tour player generally hits down through the ball, taking a divot, where the "average" player generally does not. Often times the Tour heads will have less offset as well as certain lower glare finishes like black or satin, as opposed to the shiney chrome of most retail clubs.
Grooves can also be different in Tour irons as well, not only in configuration, but in actual production. Tour iron heads will ALWAYS have precision milled grooves, where the cutting tool is changed prematurely to make sure there are no imperfections in any of the grooves, unlike retail which are mass produced and generally MUCH more sloppy in terms of quality and precision. Tour iron heads are also often made with both box and V grooves. This is distinguishable on TaylorMade Tour iron heads by the lack of swirl marks on the face of the iron. This has NOTHING to do with the face being milled, as all Tour iron heads are milled for precision. They just remove the swirl marks on the V groove heads to help reduce the spin slightly. V grooves are a lower spin head for the player who wants a flatter and more penetrating ball flight.
Tour wedges also are drastically different than their retail counterparts. They share many of the characteristics of Tour irons, but also have their own unique differences as well. Tour wedges will often have unique finishes and very unique sole grinds. More so than iron heads, to combat a variety of conditions and player styles. The most obvious difference to the eye are facial milling marks on many occasions, varying grinds, and Tour only finishes.
The main difference that makes a Tour wedge perform differently than a retail wedge is the groove. 99.9% of all Tour wedges will have a more agressive groove than retail. This groove is meant to generate more spin. This spin is a God send on very fast greens, from deep rough, and in the wind. Common sense will tell you that more spin means a higher ball flight, but with the way a groove like TaylorMade's Tour exclusive Y groove bites the ball, the flight is actually lower and more penetrating, which allows the player to generate great spin for bite, and a lower flight for MUCH improved control. Many average players enjoy seeing a high arcing wedge shot. PGA Tour pros prefer the lower, more controlled flight, assisted by their wedge grooves and confidence that the ball will bite, even when hit low and flat. Most Tour wedges will have an agressive box groove design, with the exception of TaylorMade's Y Cutter wedge which is a TaylorMade exclusive groove design which lowers flight even more, generates more green biting spin, all while not destroying premium golf balls to a great degree. It truly is THE revolutionary design in wedge grooves.
I would also like to add that some aftermarket companies will offer what they like to CALL a Tour groove. The difference is that in precision made Tour wedges, the groove is milled deep and wide, but also beveled on the edges slightly to allow for more control over the spin rate, and to avoid extreme ball sheering, which can cause unpredictible spin, unpredictible ball flight, and interfere with putting. These aftermarket company wedges may generate green holding spin, but don't be fooled into believing that they are the equal of a TRUE Tour wedge in terms of consistancy and quality. If the wedge devours the cover of a premium golf ball with regularity, take a pass. Your wedges are your SCORING clubs. Don't settle for anything but the club that gives you the best opportunity to get as close to the hole as possible, AND make the putt.

Comments from ADAMS GOLF
2) Tour equipment and retail equipment on being the same, this question has been answered many, many times in regard to every OEM's clubs. Believe it or not, they are not the same (except in certain cases and the OEM will generally inform the retailers of this), it doesn't make sense to build clubs for the best players in the world and hope that the average golfer will embrace the differences and find a tour players clubs are designed exactly the opposite of what would benefit them. Todd hammers this fact over and over again, I find it hard to believe that there is some sort of question in regard to this. This equipment is not for everyone, it spins less, launches lower, the cg's or higher and toward the toe of the club, the lie angles are flatter than any retail equipment and the bounce angles are positioned in different places. Other than that, they are pretty close.
5) I have a lot of friends in the tour end of the golf business and I will tell you that the best place to get factual info on Tour heads and equipment in from BOMBSQUADGOLF.com. I have yet to read anything that that Todd or Derek has written that is not completely true. Companies, especially golf companies, have a bit of a disconnect when it comes to thier respective tour departments, because their staff is always on the road and most of the design work is done by a select few people within their companies, most outsiders seem to grab at whatever info they hear swirling in the office.


Below is a response written by Tom Wishon:
Some of this is true and some of it is the writer being susceptible to believing what he hears with no personal real experience to substantiate it. Also, there is no way you can assume this to be true with all the companies who work with tour players to play their clubs. Each pro is different in their needs and desires and the golf companies most definitely have to pattern what they do for each individual player to make them happy in the end, which means confident with the clubs.
The part about a different titanium on the faces can be true because you have some tour players who have a very high swing speed while others don;t. Since driver heads have moved to a much larger size, and with it, larger face areas, most all of the stock OEM Ti drivers today are made with 6/4 Titanium for the face because it is possible to get to an 0.830 COR with that grade of Ti. Also, 6/4 is cheaper than the higher grade Ti alloys like SP700, 10-2-3 Ti so for a production head, if you can make the COR 0.830 with a lower priced Ti alloy for the face, why spend the extra money to duplicate the Ti with what would be a thicker face made from one of the high grade Ti alloys.
It can happen where a tour player with a very high swing speed could hit so many balls with his driver that he "fatigues" the face - here would be one reason to use one of the higher grade Ti alloys in the face of the tour player's driver. On the other hand, they could always just give him another driver when one happens to start fatiguing. So there is no rule of thumb here. As long as the player's driver has to be 0.830 COR or lower, to get to that COR with a higher strength Ti alloy face like SP or 10-2-3 you have to make the face thicker than you would if you use 6/4 Ti. Thus the thickness increase of the higher grade ti allows for more hits before the face could begin to fatigue.
IT is common for the heads used by the tour players to have a different CG position than the heads made to be sold as stock clubs to the public. Remember, when a company signs a tour player they most definitely want him/her using their clubs. So if the player does not like something about the heads the company uses in the clubs, the company will go back to work to make up whatever the player wants. If they don;t, the player will just go play with something else. AND if that happens to be a different driver, well, that's a pretty marquee club in the bag so companies usually will make whatever they have to in order to get a head with their name on it in the player's bag.
If a company has been paying tour players to use their stuff for many years, they will begin to get a feel for what has to be changed in a head for what type of player demand, swing, etc. But yes, in the back rooms of the big OEMs are tons of different variations of this or that model which all have been made for this or that tour player's individual little desires for looks, flight, feel, you name it. These players can be really picky and since there is big competition for the name players between the big moneyed golf companies, most definitely if the tour player asks, the company does it to keep them happy.
On the groove thing, I have no personal experience with this on a tour level as I do with the ti and driver matter. I know that some of the companies will experiment with groove configurations because some of the tour players are nuts about that and the companies are always interested in trying to gain some edge over the competition. Again, none of this gets experimented with unless the player himself starts to bring it up. The word "no" does not exist when it comes to the OEMs who have extensive tour endorsement programs so there are many little R&D projects that go on behind the scenes all the time with these companies and some of the players they pay.
You have to first remember what causes spin and what causes more spin. Plain and simple three things - 1) the more friction between the ball and face, the higher the spin, 2) the higher the swing speed the greater the spin, 3) the less "foreign material" between the face and the ball, the greater the spin. Now you have to look at how this all shakes out for the tour player.
1) While it is now known that the edges of the lines are a contributor to friction between ball and face, the surface in between the lines is more important because it comprises a far greater area that comes in contact with the ball. So rougher blasting of the face, AND keeping that surface freshly blasted to be right at the USGA limit for face roughness is a must for maxing out spin. yes, there can be experiments made with the shape of the edges of the lines to add to this.
2) remember the tour players all have much higher swing speeds than the majority of regular golfers. And this remains so all the way through the bag. So a pro hitting a SW into a green will likely have a higher swing speed to hit that shot than you or I will. ANd more speed = more spin.
3) the fairway mowing of the tour courses is so much shorter than yours or my golf course that there is no way you or I will hit a shot that has no "foreign material" (namely, grass) that gets in between the ball and the face. I think I heard them say at the Masters this year that they mowed the fairways to 3/8" - go ask your greenskeeper what height he mows your fairways to and I would be shocked if that number was less than 3/4". The grass on regular courses cannot survive if mowed to 1/2" or less every day of the playing season so we all get more grass in between the ball and the face than the tour players ever do. This too is also where the precision of the tour player's swing plays a part - I would bet that every single tour player's divot starts well in front of the ball so this type of more steep descending blow also promotes getting less grass between the face and the ball.
As to a different production foundry for the tour player's heads than the ones sold in stores, I doubt that. It may have happened a few times because the big OEMs do keep relationships with many production foundries and could call on the one that will do things faster when they need something special made quickly. Not all foundries have separate small custom production departments, some do. Making something quick and with a totally different set of specs or grind or face treatment, etc is very hard to do as a foundry if you do not have a mini-production line set up just for that purpose. In addition, some of this may be done at the OEM, if over the years they have invested in setting up their own in house prototype production department. Again, each one is a little different in how they handle the "one off" requests they get from their tour players.
Hope this helps,TOM

-----------------------------------------------------
Here are more comments on grade or quality of metal used:
No, this part I do not believe is true based on my experience in design and production. Virtually all of the OEMs who are large enough to have a strong presence on tour will work with the higher quality foundries to manufacture their heads. There is no way that these foundries will use lower grade Ti alloys on the production of any of their heads because I know all of them and have and do continue to work with some of them for my designs. The only think that could be possible in this would be if the OEM has a very high swing speed tour player under contract, such as 130mph and higher, they might possibly change the face to be a beta Ti grade so as to get a higher strength to withstand that swing speed. But if they did, they would also have to thicken up the face so that they still could have the head stay at or under the COR limit from the USGA.
These days with most of the driver heads now being upper 300cc to over 400cc in size, most of these heads have to be made with 6/4 titanium alloy for the face material so as to keep the COR at or slightly below the USGA minimum level. In addition, the OEMs know that even though they don;t come along very often, there will be a consumer here or there that will have a swing speed of more than 120 mph. Therfore they know that they have to make their "common" heads for retail sales to be able to withstand such an impact force. And to do that with a 6/4 Ti alloy the face would be fairly thick, but because of the larger face size, would still be able to be at or slight under the COR limit.
TOM
Here is a comment from another person in the industry:
Having been part of the titanium foundry business for many years and also having this specific discussion with well known club designer a couple of years ago during an interview, my understanding is the alloys used are design specific, not end-user specific. The quality and purity and therefore strength and material characteristics is the same. If separate tooling is made for the 'tour only' head, the tooling costs might be slightly higher due to tighter tolerances, but I'm not sure on that issue, and the difference should be minimal. The CG can certainly be altered by changing the material thickness and internal welding. As for one ti-alloy weighing significantly more than another or having less 'imperfections' for the tour heads vs consumer heads - it's all bunk. The heavier weight comes from thicker walls, with all else being the same. Hardness can vary depending on the alloy and subsequent heat treating, but it's not necessarily 'better', it's just different/optimized to suit the design parameters. As Tom mentioned regarding face thickness, the CT limits on face deflection pretty much dictates the alloy and required thickness due to the 400cc+ size of drivers.
-------------------------------------------------------
Initial replies from several OEM's:
Thank you for your email into Bridgestone Golf! There is no difference between the heads which our Tour players use compared to what is offered at retail. If you have any further questions please let us know. Thank you for your Bridgestone support!The Bridgestone Golf Team
Thank you for your e-mail and for visiting our web site. The heads arethe same for both our Tour players and our consumers (all of the headscome out of the same molds). The finished clubs are allbuilt/assembled (during the production process) to the specific specs/needs for eachindividual golfer.
Thank you for your interest in PING!
Play Your Best.
Thanks for the email.
Thank you for your support in TaylorMade products. The main differencebetween the tour issued and the retail TP are the custom specificationsthey can do. The tour heads are the same club heads but they are ableto adjust them for loft, lie, face angle, and different shafts. Thereis also a difference in the serial numbers. You can tell it is a tourproduct when the serial number only has numbers and not a combinationofletters and numbers. Please contact us again if you have any furtherquestions.
Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game.
Best Regards,
Toni from TM

The heads on Tour and TP product sold at retailers are the same heads.They both have Inverted Cone, same thickness of walls, same face, etc.The difference is that Tour product would have modifications done on itdepending on who it was for. Tour product doesnt have any differentface or head at all. They are made differently for each player.The TP products that we sell to retailers are the same.
The reason for the different serial #'s because the PGA Tour productsare not warranty and they do not carry a warranty like a TP product youwill find at taylormade retailers.I hope this clears it up. Let me know if you have anymore questions.
Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game!
Best Regards,
Eric

The CG can be changed multiple ways. The easiest is to just change theweights in the ports. Other ways include lead tape, extra glue incertain areas, and weight plugs (such as the center weight in the 460).Please let us know if you have any further questions.
Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game!
Best Regards,
Eric

Thanks for the email.
The main difference will be the serial numbers on the Tour product. Theheads are built the same way and with the same technology. However,because a head may come from Tour it could come with different lie andloft angles depending on who it was fit for. In the past, Tour headscame with a "T" serial number. However, they now come with variousserial numbers. We have information on ranges of numbers used now forTour heads. If anyone has a question please just call us at800-888-2582.
Thank you again and we wish you continued success with your golf game!
Best Regards,
Eric
consumer.feedback@tmag.com
http://taylormadegolf.com
----------------------------------------------------
Tour irons are generally dead on spec in terms of weight. You will not get a Tour set of irons with swingweights all over the board like you do with retail sets. This is because of the quality control at the high grade forging houses.
------------------------------------------------
A "tour" head will be custom setup for a certain player, IE face angle, bias, ball flight. That is the only difference from a retail head. Some heads will be custom made that never get sold by a OEM like the 580XD or Tigers SQ Max.A TM TP is the same as a TM TP tour, etc...etc
-------------------------------------------------

Original thread found at GD

Friday, January 5, 2007

The great "flaming" "tour" putter controversy

The great "flaming" putter controversy
Seems now BG_g is selling "flamed" "tour only" putters. There were only 4 ever made, claims the BS_g tour department. When TM reps were asked they say they know of no such putter. When TM is contacted via their website, they can not confirm nor deny they exist.

Rumor is that Dclown spent hours trying to the get ASGI inserts off before he just ripped them off. I Like To ROLF
A even scarier rumor is that Dclown would burn the heads with a magic touch and a torch to get the "flamed" finish and then just stick the new inserts back on the putter once they cooled down ( they do brag that they have extra ASGI inserts )
So do retail TM putters + a torch = a "tour" "flamed" putter ?

================================================
TaylorMade TOUR CorzaFinish:
BLACKQuantity:
4Neck:
#6Length:
35 (can be cut to customer spec at no charge)
Swingweight: (weight adjustable)
Price: $1000

TaylorMade TOUR CorzaFinish:
NICKELQuantity:
3Neck: #6Length: 35 (can be cut to customer spec at no charge)
Swingweight: (weight adjustable)
Price: $1000

TaylorMade TOUR CorzaFinish:
FLAME
Quantity: SOLD OUT
Neck: #6Length: 35 (can be cut to customer spec at no charge)
Swingweight: (weight adjustable)
Price: $1400



Thursday, January 4, 2007

Requesting a BAN from BSG!

X-files have taken over some posts. Disappeared without a trace

Rareguitar post Today, 10:20 PMPost

Todd,You know how I feel (see my PM to you), I dont appreciate the bush league bad mouth emails you have exchanged behind my back and I want nothing to do with you or BSG ever again. Please remove all references to me ever being here as I do not want to be associated with you or your business ever again.Bradps: To all of the cool good guys here, thanks for being cool and nice to me. I wish you all the best!Minutes until this is removed I am sure.
--------------------
Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us

Funny 4BSG pictures

Funny 4BSG pictures





Dclown the master fitter

Dclown the master fitter I Like To ROLF

Just because someone says they are a club fitter does not mean they are.
Lets see why they are so good, take time to read all the training he got from BSG.
Quotes of his posts below

DTown3011 quotes
Occupation BombSquadGolf Lead Analyst

===============

I am wondering if anyone has tried them with other shafts particularly the Dynamic Gold. I would like to know how they played in terms of trajectory and swingweight compared to the Speed Step shafts. The Speed Step shafts are (correct me if I'm wrong) 90-100g shafts, the Dynamic Golds 120-130g shafts. The Nike's already swingweight out at D1 with the Speed Step, what would they swingweight out with the DG? I have heard that the Nike heads are fairly heavy in the first place...

Also, I'm assuming trajectory was lower with the DG, I'd appreciate any opinions or insight to the Pro Combos with DG shafts.

===============

my real question is about Dynamic Gold Iron Shafts which I think I am going to go with. Have played TF Rifles and Regular Rifles and can't seem to find one I like. Have played 5.0, 5.5, and 6.0...to no avail. I would like to know the differences between R200/R300/R400 in the Dynamic Gold line. Is the R200 slightly softer than the R300 which is slightly softer than the R400? Is that how it works? Is the difference noticeable? I would like to play a SLIGHTLY firmer regular flex, and if I am correct about my assumptions was thinking R400 or S200. Please help me out.

===============

First question, is Dynamic Gold S200 = Dynamic Gold Wedge Flex?
Also, what will be the difference between S200 and S400 in a wedge?

Looking to pick up the Rifle Spinners I need to install in my Ping M/B's...need to know, parallel or taper tip?
I'm guessing parallel but I don't wanna be wrong....aren't all Ping's parallel? ACK, I'm an idiot!!!

===============

I'm just about ready to order my new set of irons and was contemplating ordering the 3-5 or the 3-4 with R300's and the 5-PW or 6-PW in S300's.

The softer shafts in the long irons will make me swing more smoothly, be easier to turn over, and will give me max distance. There is also a confidence issue here.

Looking for comparisons between the Tour Platform 26.3 and 27.3 shafts to the Fuji Speeder 652.....anyone out there tried both?
I'm looking for some spin (because it's going into a very low spin r7 Quad head) and increased launch angle.
I'm thinking the 26.3 would be perfect in the r7 head...
27.3's in the fairways?

=============

Do Dynamic Gold S300's play the same flex as DG S300's with Sensicore?
Will I notice any other differences?
Wow, if you can tell the difference between S200's and S300's then your one up on me!

===============

Have a question for the club shaft gurus out there...
Will extending a shaft, specifically a Dynamic Gold S300, 1/2" with a shaft extension have any effect on the shafts performance?
Trying to decide whether or not to reshaft completely or if I can save some money and just install shaft extensions.
I know mentally, it might be an issue, but if someone can persuade me that extensions don't hinder the performance of a steel iron shaft, than I will just go with extensions.
Someone help me out.

===============

There used to be one at http://jbaima.hypermart.net/swingweightcalc.htm but the page doesn't work anymore.....
Looking for a calculator where you plug in the shaft weight, length, head weight, length, etc. and you get a rough estimate of swingweight.
Anyone know one?

===============

This is going to be a real simple one, but I want to make sure that I'm correct with my answer before I move on:

I hit probably 100 or so 7-irons today after my round on the range trying to get some type of rhythm back...because obviously I lost it during my round! After I was done, I noticed an intriguing divot pattern: The dirt/mud from my divots on the iron was a lot deeper on the toe area. In fact, you could tell from the wear pattern on my iron that the heel was barely digging into the ground the the toe was going a lot farther into the ground!
So in essence, the toe was a lot lower at impact than the heel was...
Does this mean my clubs are too flat or too upright? My gut goes with too flat...
...
Thanks, these clubs are +1/2" so they are already 0.5º upright...but I honestly think due to the pattern of mud I'm going to have to go at least 2º more to make solid contact...
NO WONDER I HIT IT RIGHT MOST OF THE TIME!

===============

I am trying to decide what shafts to put in my clubs for next year (whatever clubs they may be!) and am having a huge dilemma!
I have had the opportunity to try everything under the sun. As far as Rifles are concerned, I have hit Rifle and Tour Flighted Rifle (5.0, 5.5, & 6.0) as well as Project X 5.5. I am just not a Rifle guy! I can't get used to the feel and I really don't enjoy them at all. I don't know what it is, but me and Rifles just don't get along.
So that leaves me at True Temper. The Tour Concept TCI shafts sound IDEAL, but there is no way I am (or can for that matter) spending $60/club to install them. After doing all my irons 3-PW and my 2 wedges, that would be $600 that I don't have. Sorry, but that is just not an option right now at this stage in my life (just getting on my feet, starting my new job, living on my own, etc.) and it wouldn't be smart either.
Onto the old tried and true, the Dynamic Gold. I love 'em, but I feel like I don't get enough height from them and also I enjoy something more lightweight. I thought about the new DG SL but I would still have the trajectory issues of regular DG. I need something that launches the ball higher and also is relatively lightweight...enter the TX-90.
The reason I thought about this is because when I had the best ballstriking year of my life (Summer 2002) I was playing lightweight, tip soft steel shafts. They were the Nike Speed Step shafts and honestly, I LOVED THEM. I loved the weight and I was hitting them at the perfect trajectory. I even was hitting my irons about 5 yards further than I did this year. I don't think it has been confirmed, but many people say the Speed Step shaft is the TT TX-90 or at least something very very similar. Is it the same or at least so similar I won't be able to tell? Is ANYONE still using these shafts and if so, how are you liking them?
I think part of me is scared, if not a little stubborn to put something other than Rifle or Dynamic Gold into my irons. I should be play whatever works, but the TX-90 didn't exactly "take off" as far as sales, and definately wasn't a popular choice for many hardcore players out there. I know they may not have the bling factor as say, a Project X or a Tour Concept, but I need to play what works, not what looks good in the signature.
Convince me I should be playing TX-90's....or else I'm going to suffer through another year of playing shafts that don't work for me. If I'm going to do that I might as well bling HARD with a set of Project X 8.0's tipped an inch

===============

According to the Dynacraft Shaft Fitting Addendum (http://www.dynacraftgolf.com/pdf/SFA04ch4.pdf) the following True Temper shafts are in order from most flexible to most stiff:

Dynamic Gold Lite X100
Dynamic Gold S200
*Dynamic Gold S300
*Dynamic Gold S400
*Dynalite Gold X100

Does the Dynamic Gold Lite really play that weak? Also DG S300, DG S400, and Dynalite X100 all tested out darn near equal as far as flex (I know the tip stiffness is different). So basically Dynalite X100 will play similar in flex to a DG S300/S400?
How accurate is the Shaft Addendum?
If it is accurate, which it looks to be, it's friggin amazing. Just wish it had Flighted Rifle on it!

Is there any way to tell a .580 core Tour Velvet from a .600 Tour Velvet just by looking at it?
BTW, the bigger the core number the smaller the grip?

===============

Probably won't be able to get my hands on some Tour Concept shafts to try them out until mid Aprilish time frame, unless I meet up with nut4golf51 on the range this weekend... (PM me Chris! )

I've read literally everything there is to read on the Tour Concepts and was wondering if someone could put into words I could comprehend how Tour Concepts FEEL. I know FEEL is very subjective, but go Henry Wadsworth Longfellow on me and give me some adjectives that would describe how they play.

My concern is that they are very Rifle-like in terms of feel, which not only do I not like but cannot get used to. I have hit everything Rifle (PX, TFR, Rifle, etc.) and have yet to find a Rifle shaft I like feel-wise. They have a weird crisp feeling that I do not like, almost like the shaft isn't moving at impact. Very butt stiff.

I am hoping they are more True Temper-like in terms of feel, as I really havn't hit a TT shaft I did not like in that regard. I've hit them all (DG, Dynalite Gold, TX-90, DG SL) and really enjoy the smoothness and kick thru impact. I am currently playing Dynalite Gold in the irons because they fit me well due to the increased spin and launch characteristics they provide. The TCI's sound even better spec wise.

Convince me that maybe at the end of the year I should invest in a set of TCI S3's....

===============

I had a chance to pick up my brand new in the plastic Cleveland Comp last night

I put my trusty Accra T60 into it at 44.5" and got a finished swingweight of just above C9 with a V-55 grip.

Added some lead tape to get it to D1 but was wondering what swingweights you guys were getting as well? Seems to be a good headweight because @ 45" standard it would have been dead on D2.

===============

Just wondering if there are any differences between the BLUE UST iRod shaft you get in the Sonartec MD's and the retail UST iRod shaft that is RED/Black

===============

I understand the concept of softstepping and hardstepping. Does anyone know HOW MUCH it actually makes the shafts play softer or weaker?

For example: Say you have 2 sets of taper tip shafts, X100 and S300 Dynamic Golds as a benchmark. If you softstepped the X100's and hardstepped the S300 would have have 2 sets that play extremely similar?

I guess what I'm trying to figure out is exactly how much weaker/stiffer the softstepping/hardstepping actually makes a shaft. Has anyone actually quantified it?

Reason being (I'm not going to lie) is that althought I'm going to give my TCI X1's softstepped once a FULL run around...I really love the short irons but the long irons don't go as high as I had hoped. Possibly a bit firm. Was thinking hardstepped S3's would be possibly better, but if they aren't going to be that much different than whats the point?

So hardstepped S3's will play noticably softer than softstepped X1's. I think that may be exactly what I'm looking for...

How about trajectory differences vs. a hardstepped S3 and an softstepped X1? Obviously the S3 will hit higher, no?

===============

Since Tour Concept shafts have a progressive tip design and are designed for individual irons, has anyone had any problems/complaints about softstepping a set of them before?

Since normal #2-4 iron go high in Tour Concept, would 3-5 fly on a higher trajectory if you softstepped them?

Someone throw me a bone here...

My concern is the ballflight actually, and I would prefer it to be higher. The thing is, the X1's will already keep the ballflight down, SO I was thinking softstepping them would actually give the 3-5 a bit higher flight...along with a slightly softer feel? True?

Assuming X1 will hit lower than S3 (which I'm sure they will) it's actually the opposite...

Maybe instead of doing all this mulling I'll just throw them in and see how they work. What a freakin' concept.

===============

I swung the driver as good as I have all summer today. Lots of dead center hits, SUPER SOLID, felt bombed...high bombs with a slight draw on them. Also a lot of nice power fades.

Unfortunately I'm 100% MAXXED OUT at 250 yards.

Seriously, I could not it it ANY further. My playing partners were 15 and sometimes 30 yards past me. One swings slightly slower or as fast as me, the other maybe slightly faster than me.

My pitch marks were roughly 1-2 yards behind where my ball stopped. Lots of roll...

We lasered ALL of my good drives, and EVERY time....250 yards.

One of my partners commented on how it looked like my ballflight was "rising" with my driver. Not flat, not penetrating.

It's gotta be a spin issue right? Obviously, I can fix the swing, but with my current move, can I really be maxxed at *gasp* 250 yards?!

Please tell me I'm not MAXXED OUT....and it's the drivers fault!

The shaft flex is fine. I am actually LOVING the feel of the Rombax 705A PROTO, and the X-flex untipped feels great. Best shaft I've hit in awhile and I don't know why more people don't try them out. Can really feel it loading thru the swing but never feels lose.

But...it's Diamana! Gotta bite the bug, right?



DClown versus Tom Wishon

DClown versus Tom Wishon

Let me first state that I have nothing against Tom Wishon. I'm sure he knows 100x more than me in terms of golf equipment. I do not claim to be an expert, but I do try to speak from firsthand knowledge of what I know to be fact and fact only.

He's certainly proven over the years that he is EXTREMELY knowledgable in the field of golf equipment expertise, however, a lot of his information is not only dated but incorrect in the world of modern clubs, especially shaft technology. His comments regarding shafts are not only alarming, but also dated, and I personally know more than a few OEMs that have been laughing at a few of his responses. Technology has passed many of his ideals by. In no way am I saying that he doesn't know what he's talking about...that's surely been proven 100 times over to be incorrect...what I'm saying is Tom should really be up on the latest and greatest before he publishes rules and absolutes based on shaft design that have been proven wrong by more than one OEM shaft manufacturer.

Simply put, clubfitting is not an absolute science. It's a BLEND of art & science. You can't just look something up in a book, read a chart, or fit based off what a computer screen tells you. There are so many variables in clubfitting nowadays that you have to take things like player preferences, personal feel, and the basic human mind into account. All the tools and technologies fitters utilize nowadays should be used as TOOLS, guidelines, and blueprints to the fitting process...but they should NEVER replace the human element, intelligence, and intimate knowledge of the product they are working with. Clubfitting doesn't have laws etched in stone or absolutes written on a golden tablet. While there are certainly many standards, nothing will ever replace a highly knowledgable and skilled fitter, not even a computer or a launch monitor can do that...and in some cases, the wheels of technology are turning faster than Mr. Wishon can write.


TOM WISHON
To Everyone on the Other Post About Square Drivers

I don't normally scan the threads and posts on this Forum but after getting an email this AM telling me I should, I decided to log in and see what all the fuss is about. Phew! Lots to set the record straight on, so I apologize in advance for this post being pretty long.

The article I wrote about square drivers that was quoted on the other thread came from my own company's email newsletter, TWGT E-TECHreport. That newsletter is written for the custom clubmakers so I apologize if some of you did not understand some of the terms or the MOI increment of measurement. I also write for PGA Tour Partners magazine, so in the next issue of that publication, I did a much shorter, less technical explanation of the square drivers and how to determine if one of them is right for you. I'm not against square drivers in general - I simply want golfers to understand what they'll be looking at, how to evaluate if one is good for you, and to make sure you don;t assume that just because it is square, it is better.

Swing Man did a really good job of "translating" some of the pertinent points from my article in his post on page 2 of the original thread on this subject. So if you want the plain facts, find Swing Man's post and you'll understand more clearly what I am saying about square drivers.

Having worked in the golf equipment industry since 1972 and having been a designer since 1986, it is truly unfortunate that so many golfers who all share the same love of this great game can get so angry or mean or just plain negative about something like this. I truly believe that I am fortunate to have found a career that I like so much and that I still get excited about every day I wake up. A long time ago I realized thatthere is so much misinformation in this business that can cause golfers to make the wrong buying decisions for their games. I simply have a passion to state the facts about golf clubs as I know it from my 20 yrs of design experience and 30+ yrs of clubfitting experience.

No, I am not right 100% of the time, but I am confident after this many years in the business that I am right in my technical explanations and assessments of golf clubs more often than anyone else in this business. Here's one reason why I can say that. In my side of the business, I have had to design models for product lines that each year had to have 6-8 new different models of woods, 6-8 new different models of irons, and a lot of wedges and putters - the reason is because that is how the big component companies do business. Baskin/Robbins 31 flavors so you can offer every material, form of manufacture, etc. Do that for as many years as I have and you tend to learn a ton about design, manufacturing and what design elements work and don't work for what golf swing and golfer type in a golf club. OEM companies design one new model each year, and have teams of people doing it, so no one person in an OEM company can possibly have the full, overall depth of design experience I do.

I don't think I pontificate as one of the posters said or at least I don;t want it to be perceived that way - I am admittedly VERY passionate about my work and about golf clubs in general and I can't stand it when bad information about golf clubs and fitting is put forth and believed by un-knowing golfers who think because the source is a big brand name company that it has to be factual. I fight hard for what I think is right, and I try to do that without being condescending or insulting. But I know I always debate technical points on the technical points and never on the brand or a commercial bent. If you read my book, The Search for the Perfect Golf Club, you'll see that it is only about the design/assembly factors in clubs and how they need to be selected for any golfer type.

For those of you who think companies who sell components are crap companies, in >90% of the cases you are absolutely right. It's too easy for someone to find open models or get knock offs from struggling foundries to sell and portray themselves as an "expert" when they are far from it. And because >90% of the component companies have no business being in this business, that certainly casts a negative pallor over us all. But in thinking that 100% of the companies who are in the component business are garbage, you're missing some pretty good designs and some decent information that might help you make a little better buying decision the next time you go shopping for a new club(s).

If I am so good in what I do, why aren't my designs on tour, in more golfers' bags, a part of an OEM product line? Those who ask this simply do not understand the BUSINESS of golf clubs. Money talks, and when you read DTown's post on the other thread about one OEM spending $162,000,000 in marketing over the past three years, wow, in the hands of marketing "experts", that much $$ certainly can sway a lot of public opinion. Mutiply that by the number of other "9 figure golf companies" out there and you will have a case of many people thinking, "don't confuse me with the facts, my mind's already made up."

As one of the posters said, I have had the opportunity to head up design for one of the biggest OEMs but I turned down the offer. I dislike big corporate attitudes and their rules/trappings, but most of all because I could not get my arms around the fact that if I did accept the position, I would be doing nothing but helping to provide golfers with yet another standard mass produced golf club design to be sold off the rack and never custom fit.

Some of the most enjoyable times in my career have been when I got the chance to design custom sets from scratch for Scott Verplank, Crenshaw, Lietzke and the last set that Payne Stewart played in competition before that terrible accident. I haven't designed for 50 tour pros because the companies I designed for just did not spend the money to hire a whole bunch of pros, but these pros liked what I created and so I guess I am the only designer from this side of the business whose designs have been used to win on the PGA and Champions Tours and in Ryder Cup competition.

I'm very proud that I was able to think up and create some design firsts before any other company - first draw biased metal wood in 95, first graphite + metal driver in 96, first titanium driver in the US in 94, and so on. They're listed on my web sites if you are interested. If you would like some verification of my knowledge, you can ask any of the equipment editors for any of the game's major publications what they think of the info I give them when they call - they talk to all the game's technical experts so they've had many chances to compare what I tell them to what they hear from the others. Call 'em and ask what they think of my knowledge.

I learned a long time ago in my work that real custom fitting, meaning building the set from scratch to have every possible specification matched as accurately as possible to each golfer's size/strength/athletic ability/swing characteristics, is better for ALL golfers than simply buying a standard made set off the rack. I have said this countless times - there is nothing wrong with the clubhead, shaft, and grip quality of the big brand name companies. I know that because in some of my past work I have been a paid consultant for two foundries who produced heads for Taylor Made, Mizuno, Nike, Wilson, etc - so I have seen first hand that their quality is good. These foundries hired me to help them stay up on the latest materials, solve manufacturing problems and help them get a little better at making the heads for their golf company customers because they liked the suggestions I would make when I was sheparding my own designs through their factories.

The only thing wrong about the OEMs is that their primary business model is to make standard clubs to sell off the rack in a "one size fits all" manner. Golfers who think that getting to choose a shaft flex you have no idea how stiff/flexible the letter on the shaft says it is within that one model of a shaft, or golfers who think choosing a driver loft between 8.5 and 11* is 'custom fitting', then they are very ill-informed about what REAL custom fitting is and what it really can do for all golfers.

Think about this for a second. . . .

Golf is the only "bat and ball sport" whose participants cannot buy their "bats" off the rack in a custom fit form to match their swing and manner of play. Look at baseball/softball bats. You head into any top sporting goods store and within each brand and model of bat, you will see a myriad of different LENGTHS, different WEIGHTS, different HANDLE DIAMETERS - bats are not all the same length/weight/grip size because the bat makers and the retailers all know people who shop for a bat won't and can't play with the same specs. Tennis too - all high quality brand name rackets are sold in different grip sizes and with no strings - again because the racket makers and retailers know that tennis players have to choose the right grip size, their preferred string type and the right string tension for their swing and how they play.

But not golf - despite the fact golfers come in all sizes, strengths, level of athletic ability and most of all, different swing characteristics. The reason you don't see in golf clubs what you do in bats and rackets is because we golfers have to buy and use 14 clubs, not ONE. From a pure business standpoint, can you imagine what a hassle it would be for the club companies to have to forecast, make, stock and ship the same club model but in different lengths, different weights, different face angles, different grip sizes, etc etc - and likewise can you imagine the retailers having to stock and display all these custom variations in 8 to 10 different brands?? Standard, one size fits all is the way it has to be done for convenience and all the marketing is aimed to tell golfers what pros use these clubs and how great they are right off the rack - and millions of golfers buy into that despite the fact they would play better and more consistently if they were truly custom fit.

The reason you do not see more component designs on tour or in fellow golfers' bags is because no component company makes the profit or volume to accumulate $162,000,000 in three years with which to market and sway public opinion. Most retailers of golf clubs do not want to have the mess of doing their own assembly, much less spend that much time building sets for golfers when they can just stock standard clubs that have real demand generated by $162,000,000 times 4 or 5 spent over three years. An OEM makes 5 times the profit on each standard driver they sell to a retail shop that a component company makes selling a driver HEAD in "ones and twos" to individuals who range from the best clubmakers on the planet to people who are lucky to know what end of the shaft to install in the head.

In my last position, I busted my chops trying to get the company to let me set up training and custom fitting programs for their retail division. They said no because of several reasons, 1) we only make 20-25% profit on each OEM club we sell so we cannot allow the sales staff to take more than 10-15 mins to make the sale, 2) we can't feature custom fitting because it takes too long for the profit it generates and besides, the OEMs would get mad at us for competing with them, 3) the sales people turnover is too great to merit spending the time/money to train them like that. Kinda sad, eh? And those are the people that sell many of you the golf clubs with which you play. Yes, there are a few retailers of golf clubs who do a fine job training and servicing their customers. But the operative word is few, not many because the emphasis today is more about sales than making sure every golfer walks out with the best clubs for THEIR game.

Sorry for the length of this. As I said, I am very passionate about this field and I really want to help golfers get the best for their game and for their money. Best advice I have is to go to amazon.com, Borders, Barnes&Noble and get a copy of The Search for the Perfect Golf Club or the other new one about drivers. Read it. You won't see "sales speak" or "marketing hype" in there and any of the advice I give in there can be done with an OEM club if you wish. All I care about is that golfers realize the facts of life about golf clubs and then go make an informed buying decision. Yes, I am very much PRO-CUSTOM FITTING because 30+ yrs of watching and working with golfers tells me GOOD custom fitting is indisputably better than standard off the rack when the goal is for the golfer to spend his/her money wisely and end up with a set that truly can offset some of the negatives in their swing and accent the positives.

But don't assume that a golf club is good for you just because the company is huge, or you see it in a tour players' bag, or you see it in ads and on TV. Please take the time to learn a little about the technology of how clubs really work for different swings - if you do you will be happier with your purchases and enjoy the game a little more. And if you have questions about things that confuse you, email me and I will be happy to offer the pros and cons from facts, not hype or marketing.

TOM WISHON

BombsquadGolf's Todd Thrun vs. Tom Wishon part II

BombsquadGolf's Todd Thrun vs. Tom Wishon part II

This weeks entry started off just like almost every other skirmish on the site, with Todd wagging his tongue when he really shouldn't. Here's the relevant entry:

I was talking yesterday with one of the most influential individuals in golf and we were talking about high end fitting and custom high end product.

In other words he was talking to his business partner.

We were talking about off the rack clubs or used equipment, and he said to me and I quote...."I don't care about that guy. There's a place for him and it's called Golfsmith. The rest of them can worm around Ebay looking for next best deal. Frankly, we don't care about them." It's harsh, but it's true. That mentality works against playing better golf by proper fitting and superior equipment. The "old guard" just doesn't really fit into where BSG is going.

This is a very veiled reference to Tom Wishon.

As for Tom Wishon, good guy, smart guy, but even he made this statement in 1997. I received this from an Industry individual as example that we shouldn't pretend we know everything, and should always stay humble in the way we present our "opinions". "The Insider's Guide to Golf Equipment" written by Nick Mastroni. On page 38 of the 1997 edition Mr. Wishon is quoted as saying: "Rebound velocities- that's where the real mythsare about titanium. Ive heard a number of manufacturers tell customers that a titanium clubface actually rebounds backward at impact, then snaps forward, as if to'slingshot' the ball off the clubface. This is a load of hogwash! The material in a clubhead has a totally different coefficient of restitution than the golf ball does. Even if a clubface deformed somewhat at impact, which it doesn't, the ball would be gone before the clubface had a chance to re-form outward. This is something that does not happen, cannot happen, and is a total myth. There is no inherent difference in the way the ball comes of the face of a stainless steel versus a titanium driver." Take from it what you will, but not everyone knows everything, and we shouldn't act like we do. Mr. Wishon told us to buy his fitting book. What if I had bought this one. Just a joke....just a joke. Seriously, Tom is pretty much a class guy, and one of the pioneers of the industry, but the group of trolls that worship the man really reflect badly on that entire group of component oriented guys, and it's disappointing to see him bring a high and mighty attitude to MY site in response to a bunch of trolls getting him worked up. Fitting is art coupled with science. There is no "book" that tells you how to fit players perfectly. Most of it is opinion. I have mine, and others have theirs, but to imply that one is better than that other is ridiculous. Mine comes from a mix of sitting in on Tour fittings, being at OEM test and pro fitting facilites, and intimate understanding of the properties of our products. This isn't 1987 Lynx, and prolite shaft technology. It's a whole different world now. NASA aerospace engineers are designing golf clubs and shafts. It's not like it was 20 years ago. As I said before, I know Tour and super high end product and where that is going. Some guys knows components and are terrific at custom fitting. We both do what we do very well, but I shouldn't pretend to be all knowing about what they work with, and vise versa, because we will both come out looking ignorant if we try to do that.

IOW, Tom's take on the state of the industry in 1997 doesn't match the current reality. Stunning that!

Tom took a few days, but replied today with:

Your quote - Take from it what you will, but not everyone knows everything, and we shouldn't act like we do. Mr. Wishon told us to buy his fitting book. What if I had bought this one. Just a joke....just a joke.

My quote - "The Insider's Guide to Golf Equipment" written by Nick Mastroni. On page 38 of the 1997 edition Mr. Wishon is quoted as saying:
"Rebound velocities- that's where the real mythsare about titanium. Ive heard a number of manufacturers tell customers that a titanium clubface actually rebounds backward at impact, then snaps forward, as if to'slingshot' the ball off the clubface. This is a load of hogwash! The material in a clubhead has a totally different coefficient of restitution than the golf ball does. Even if a clubface deformed somewhat at impact, which it doesn't, the ball would be gone before the clubface had a chance to re-form outward. This is something that does not happen, cannot happen, and is a total myth.

Todd, I gather you are in your 20’s so you probably are not aware of the evolution of Ti as a driver head material. I’d like to tell you a few things about titanium woodhead manufacture, circa 1996, which is when Nick Mastroni contacted me for information for his 1997 book.

The number one reason golf companies began to look at titanium for making driver heads starting in the early 90s is because the companies could see from the original steel Big Bertha that bigger drivers were lighting up the industry. With its 4.5 g/cc density compared to 7.8g/cc for steel, titanium would enable them to make larger drivers than would ever be possible with steel alloys. No one really understood then what we learned in the late 90s about the relationship of yield strength and modulus to actually make the face flex, which in turn would make the ball compress less, lose less energy as a result, and leave the face a little faster.

When the top clubhead production foundries bought their first vacuum casting furnaces in the early 90s, they ALL had a heckuva learning curve to deal with. Stainless steel can be cast in open air. Titanium cannot because it oxidizes horribly, which ruins its mechanical properties. What’s more, molten titanium has a viscosity closer to molasses while molten steel’s is more like water. Casting titanium into very thin wall sections was a nightmare for these companies to learn and it took them YEARS to learn how to do that.

None of the big clubhead foundries even thought about forging titanium woodheads. Their expertise lay in investment casting, so that’s how they started to make Ti driver heads. Up until the late 90s, the few foundries that had the money to buy a vacuum casting furnace to make Ti driver heads ($1.2 million back then for ONE small vacuum furnace that would make only 150 heads per melt run) struggled with reject rates of 30-50% per run.

By 1996 with 2 yrs experience under their belts, reject rates were still 20%+ because of the sheer difficulty of casting titanium into porosity free heads. The FACES were cast as a part of the body, which NO ONE does today. To make these Ti driver faces withstand 120+mph swing speeds, the faces were all cast at 3.2 to 3.5mm in thickness. The only titanium alloy capable of being investment cast was 6/4. Even under the best processing, 6/4 has the same yield strength as 17-4 stainless steel, the alloy of choice for all cast steel woodheads then and still today. The largest of the Ti driver heads at this time were 250cc because the foundries simply could not make a Ti driver head any larger and have it stand up to impact due to the difficulty of casting 6/4 Ti to be porosity free.

Take a 250cc driver head made ALL from investment cast 6/4 with a face of 3.2-3.5mm thickness and you have a driver with a COR that was the same as what a well made 17-4 stainless driver of 200cc. Hence in 1996 when Nick Mastroni from GOLF magazine contacted me for a comment for his planned book, my comment was totally accurate for the time.

I gather that you have never learned anything that you found through further experience and study to be different today from what it was 10 yrs ago. Or in another form, why do you suppose a senior writer from GOLF magazine came to me for information for his book at the time when he had the whole industry to contact. I guess he figured I knew something about this stuff, even back then.

It was only when foundries started to turn to forging faces separately or plate forming to make Ti driver heads that we all discovered what the better strength to elasticity ratio of some TI alloys over steel could do to the face flexing and resulting decrease of the ball compressing against the face. And that is why no Ti driver heads have been made with cast faces since these other production methods were initiated and perfected. Cast bodies today, yes, but there are no cast titanium faces in woodheads anymore because of what we learned when you were probably still in high school.

Now hold on a minute because I have an offer to make to you.

Your quote - It's a whole different world now. NASA aerospace engineers are designing golf clubs and shafts. It's not like it was 20 years ago.

It’s obvious you seem to think that I am living in the dark ages of golf club technology with nothing but a few “trolls” who listen to what I have to say. I believe I am not, so here’s what I would like to do. I hear you guys live in Las Vegas, one of the top getaway destinations in the country. You go find a hotel and book their ballroom for a day – you pick the date – and you and I can sit down and have a discussion about golf equipment. If you want, you can promote it on your Forum to your members and if you like, charge a few bucks for admission. I’ll pay for the ballroom, soft drinks and snacks for everyone and you can keep all the money from admission from anyone who wants to come to listen to us. And we’ll just sit down and talk about golf clubs for how ever long you wish.

How about it? You name the date and I’ll be happy to be there so we both and any of your BSG members who join us might be able to learn a little more. OK? My email address is tww@wishongolf.com so let me know what works out best for you.

TOM WISHON

Once again Todd takes a swipe at Tom and Tom replies with class and an invitation to talk clubmaking. The fact that Todd doesn't understand the history of golf isn't all that surprising. In 1997 he was likely just trying to understand how to start his baseball card company. You could say that Tom has forgotten more about clubmaking than Todd has ever known, but I'm not sure that's true. I don't think Tom has forgotten very much. Then again Todd doesn't know very much.

Not surprisingly Todd pulled Tom's post shortly after it was posted.

Interestingly, after pulling the original post, Todd posts the following:

"Tom and I are actually discussing everything privately. In all honesty, I'd LOVE the chance to sit down with Tom Wishon and discuss golf clubs. He is one of the pioneers of our industry. Who WOULDN'T love the chance to sit with Tom Wishon and discuss clubs. I imagine I would just be listening most of the time. He and I do different things certainly, but when it comes to the dynamics of the golf club, few people know more than Tom Wishon. Maybe we could have Tom on a chat or something at some point in the near future if he's open to it.

As for calling me one of the "brightest brains in the golf club industry". That's a stretch. I know about the products I test and sell, and I am confident in my ability to fit my customers into those products, but you are giving me MUCH too much credit. My knowledge of making golf clubs isn't anywhere near Tom Wishon. Thanks for the compliment, but it's not deserved. I'm just a guy who runs a golf site and sells high end golf clubs.

Also, wanted to add that Mr. Wishon is REALLY a class guy. He also requested that all threads bashing BSG be removed from the forum he sponsors. First class move in my opinion. I'd like to take a moment to say I am sorry if anything I had ever said was taken the wrong way about the man. I have the utmost respect for Mr. Wishon and always have. As Mr. Wishon has asked that all BSG-negative threads be removed from other sites, I ask that none of my admins or mods comments on Mr. Wishon in the future. Let the members lead that discussion from here on out. Myself included."

Which prompted the following from Tom:

"Hmmm - did he say that I called him "one of the brightest brains in the golf club industry"?

I did NOT say anything of the sort in any email exchange I made with him this AM. I simply asked him to stop attacking me and my work in his posts, and if he did that I would disappear and not make any other responses or posts.

That is ALL I said in my email exchange with him this AM."

Todd is making up conversation with Tom to try and smooth things over, at least until the next time he sticks his foot in his mouth.

http://compgolfer.com/2006/11/bombsquadgolfs_todd_thrun_vs_t.html

Just to check and see what someone posted vs what was really said on the inside.

http://www.bombsquadgolf.com/invboard_release/upload/index.php?showtopic=137311&hl=



The Reply

tomwishon Today, 02:31 PM Post #27


Gallery


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: March-17 06
Member No.: 26,128
Handicap:7



AZ Devil Cat:

I am sorry that I am not as coherent in this Forum's procedures/ways as I should be. Are you Todd who wrote the posts about my lack of shaft knowledge? Or are you someone who sent Todd's post to me to read and offer a response?

Anyway, since that post came to me and this thread has a request for a comment on this, happy to oblige - and then I have to get back to work!!!

(QUOTE) Tom Wishon huh? Wishon makes a fine component clubhead, but to be 100% honest, the shaft companies are looking sidways at him about his less than up to date statements on golf shafts. I doubt he even knows there IS a difference in Tour clubs. He is a COMPONENT maker. That's another hilarious thing about these loser morons. It's PROVEN that there are obvious CG differences in Tour heads, and ANY OEM that is being honest will tell you the same thing. It's really not even a debateable subject. It's like trying to refute the earth is round. Todd

(TW RESPONSE) Less than up to date statements about shafts?? Not according to Robin Arthur, he being the composites engineer who designed the Graffaloy ProLite and every Grafalloy shaft until TT bought them. I've also had off the record emails over the years from people who used to work for this or that shaft maker who told me that there are shaft companies out there today who really do not know precisely what the shaft does in the swing, and what swing movements have a direct effect on the shaft's bending and performance and feel.

(TW RESPONSE) I doubt he even knows there IS a difference in tour clubs. Wrong - not only my experience in designing sets for Verplank, Lietzke, Crenshaw and Payne says you're wrong there, but also my experience in having worked on the buy outs of Lynx and Snake Eyes gave me that experience in seeing all the different molds and heads from Lynx that had been specially made for their tour players. Also, some months back there was a thread about this very subject on GEA Forum that I commented on using my experience in this area. Just because I have chosen to work in the component side of the industry does not mean I don;t have real tour design experience - I do.

(QUOTE) What you are saying is correct. Different materials offer different combinations and thus do translate in performance. You can clearly limited to what you can do with steel. Mr. Wishon's point is that two shafts with the indentical weight, torque, balance point, length and overall stiffness will perform the same regardless of the material. How can that not be true? You can spec a shaft and rip it down, then recreate it. I know of one major shaft company who ripped down an Altus and recreated the bend profile and all specs precisely using the materials that they normally construct their products with. The result, while both shafts were identical in measurable specs, performed entirely differently when they put it on the Byron. Material differences allow construction in a way that cannot be replicated in some cases. You can replicate the specs and the profile, but not the performance.

(RESPONSE) If you're testing shafts with an Iron Byron, that's a mistake right there. Unlike the Golf Labs robot, Byron does not gear its swing from torque inputs, which is how a real human swings the club. Therefore, Byron will never replicate a human swing in the sense of the arms beginning to slow down when the release happens, which in turn sends centripetal force to the club/clubhead, which in turn combines with the slowing down of the arms in the swing to cause the clubhead to flex the shaft forward at impact. Byron can't do that and it is why all companies with Byrons are getting rid of them and replacing them with robots that have multiple servo-motors to more closely simulate a human swing.

(RESPONSE) Two shafts with the identical weight, torque, balance point, length and overall stiffness will perform the same regardless of the material. This is true in PERFORMANCE because we've done it a number of times in controlled testing. But PERFORMANCE is not the same as FEEL of the shaft. And when it comes to fitting accomplished players, FEEL IS HUGELY IMPORTANT in shaft fitting. In fact among most tour players, FEEL IS NUMBER ONE in shaft fitting because their confidence is so triggered by the feel they perceive when hitting any club/head/shaft. Fitting a shaft to match a specific FEEL requirement of a player is without question the most difficult task in all of clubfitting. It took me two years to learn how to do this for Scott Verplank because he has such a precise sense of feel for the action of the shaft. But when I figured out how to do it for HIM, then I had to learn all over how to do it for Payne, who also had a real precise sense of FEEL that was different than Scott's.

Enough, I'm done - going back to my work and will recommend that Todd get a copy of Common Sense Clubfitting to see if there is something in there that might help him learn a little more about this great craft of clubmaking and fitting.

TOM WISHON

BombsquadGolf, do you have a store or not?

BombsquadGolf, do you have a store or not?

From the Bombsquadgolf about me page on eBay:

Hello, for those of you who do not know us, we are BombSquadGolf. We own an incredible store in Las Vegas Nevada that has a full service repair shop, state of the art full swing fitting facility, the world's ONLY official Bettinardi putter fitting studio, and a full retail shop. Our website is the world famous, and industry respected forum and store bombsquadgolf.com

In our shop, we can litterally do anything you would want done to a golf club. We can bend and adjust the face angles on metal woods, blueprint irons and wedges, change the internal weight and COG bias of metal woods, and conduct all basic club repairs. We carry the full lines of Taylormade, Callaway, Bridgestone, Mizuno, Cleveland, and Nike, along with the highest end shaft manufacturers Fujikura, Mitsubishi Rayon, and Graphite Design. We also are the World's foremost authority and dealer of PGA Tour issued merchandise which is our specialty. Come see us and experience a whole new world of Golf Equipment.

From the BombsquadGolf website, here's their address:

BombSquadGolf
209 S. Stephanie St.
Suite B, #202
Henderson, NV 89012

From a reader on the internet, here is a picture of that address:

How big of a putting studio can you have in a 5" high mailbox?

By the way, there really is at least one Bettinardi studio though, you can read about it here.

Note: The eBay about page has been changed to reflect the fact that they really don't have a retail store. It is a fantasy in the head of the proprietor, just like his index. At least according to the few people that he's actually played golf with.

http://compgolfer.com/2006/11/bombsquadgolf_do_you_have_a_st.html

BombsquadGolf post of the week

BombsquadGolf post of the week

OK, so I'm turning more into all Bombsquad all the time. This one is really good though and has come the closest to showing the true colors of the people that run the site. It all started with two posts that Tom has made recently. One was a post asserting that two shafts that are the same weight, length, overall stiffness that have the same torque and balance point will perform identical to each other. This assertion of course runs counter to the #1 purpose of BombsquadGolf; to get people to overpay for overpriced "rare" shafts. The other post is on Tom's website.

In a post in the BombsquadGolf insider area, the proprietor of BSG, Todd Thrun (BigHitter) posted:

Tom Wishon huh? Wishon makes a fine component clubhead, but to be 100% honest, the shaft companies are looking sidways at him about his less than up to date statements on golf shafts. I doubt he even knows there IS a difference in Tour clubs. He is a COMPONENT maker. That's another hilarious thing about these loser morons. It's PROVEN that there are obvious CG differences in Tour heads, and ANY OEM that is being honest will tell you the same thing. It's really not even a debateable subject. It's like trying to refute the earth is round. Todd

Just for those of you keeping score at home, Todd called one of the most reputable club builders in the world a "loser moron".

Someone forwarded the message to Wishon and he chose to reply publicly. Here's what he posted:

To Everyone on the Other Post About Square Drivers

I don't normally scan the threads and posts on this Forum but after getting an email this AM telling me I should, I decided to log in and see what all the fuss is about. Phew! Lots to set the record straight on, so I apologize in advance for this post being pretty long.

The article I wrote about square drivers that was quoted on the other thread came from my own company's email newsletter, TWGT E-TECHreport. That newsletter is written for the custom clubmakers so I apologize if some of you did not understand some of the terms or the MOI increment of measurement. I also write for PGA Tour Partners magazine, so in the next issue of that publication, I did a much shorter, less technical explanation of the square drivers and how to determine if one of them is right for you. I'm not against square drivers in general - I simply want golfers to understand what they'll be looking at, how to evaluate if one is good for you, and to make sure you don;t assume that just because it is square, it is better.

Swing Man did a really good job of "translating" some of the pertinent points from my article in his post on page 2 of the original thread on this subject. So if you want the plain facts, find Swing Man's post and you'll understand more clearly what I am saying about square drivers.

Having worked in the golf equipment industry since 1972 and having been a designer since 1986, it is truly unfortunate that so many golfers who all share the same love of this great game can get so angry or mean or just plain negative about something like this. I truly believe that I am fortunate to have found a career that I like so much and that I still get excited about every day I wake up. A long time ago I realized thatthere is so much misinformation in this business that can cause golfers to make the wrong buying decisions for their games. I simply have a passion to state the facts about golf clubs as I know it from my 20 yrs of design experience and 30+ yrs of clubfitting experience.

No, I am not right 100% of the time, but I am confident after this many years in the business that I am right in my technical explanations and assessments of golf clubs more often than anyone else in this business. Here's one reason why I can say that. In my side of the business, I have had to design models for product lines that each year had to have 6-8 new different models of woods, 6-8 new different models of irons, and a lot of wedges and putters - the reason is because that is how the big component companies do business. Baskin/Robbins 31 flavors so you can offer every material, form of manufacture, etc. Do that for as many years as I have and you tend to learn a ton about design, manufacturing and what design elements work and don't work for what golf swing and golfer type in a golf club. OEM companies design one new model each year, and have teams of people doing it, so no one person in an OEM company can possibly have the full, overall depth of design experience I do.

I don't think I pontificate as one of the posters said or at least I don;t want it to be perceived that way - I am admittedly VERY passionate about my work and about golf clubs in general and I can't stand it when bad information about golf clubs and fitting is put forth and believed by un-knowing golfers who think because the source is a big brand name company that it has to be factual. I fight hard for what I think is right, and I try to do that without being condescending or insulting. But I know I always debate technical points on the technical points and never on the brand or a commercial bent. If you read my book, The Search for the Perfect Golf Club, you'll see that it is only about the design/assembly factors in clubs and how they need to be selected for any golfer type.

For those of you who think companies who sell components are crap companies, in >90% of the cases you are absolutely right. It's too easy for someone to find open models or get knock offs from struggling foundries to sell and portray themselves as an "expert" when they are far from it. And because >90% of the component companies have no business being in this business, that certainly casts a negative pallor over us all. But in thinking that 100% of the companies who are in the component business are garbage, you're missing some pretty good designs and some decent information that might help you make a little better buying decision the next time you go shopping for a new club(s).

If I am so good in what I do, why aren't my designs on tour, in more golfers' bags, a part of an OEM product line? Those who ask this simply do not understand the BUSINESS of golf clubs. Money talks, and when you read DTown's post on the other thread about one OEM spending $162,000,000 in marketing over the past three years, wow, in the hands of marketing "experts", that much $$ certainly can sway a lot of public opinion. Mutiply that by the number of other "9 figure golf companies" out there and you will have a case of many people thinking, "don't confuse me with the facts, my mind's already made up."

As one of the posters said, I have had the opportunity to head up design for one of the biggest OEMs but I turned down the offer. I dislike big corporate attitudes and their rules/trappings, but most of all because I could not get my arms around the fact that if I did accept the position, I would be doing nothing but helping to provide golfers with yet another standard mass produced golf club design to be sold off the rack and never custom fit.

Some of the most enjoyable times in my career have been when I got the chance to design custom sets from scratch for Scott Verplank, Crenshaw, Lietzke and the last set that Payne Stewart played in competition before that terrible accident. I haven't designed for 50 tour pros because the companies I designed for just did not spend the money to hire a whole bunch of pros, but these pros liked what I created and so I guess I am the only designer from this side of the business whose designs have been used to win on the PGA and Champions Tours and in Ryder Cup competition.

I'm very proud that I was able to think up and create some design firsts before any other company - first draw biased metal wood in 95, first graphite + metal driver in 96, first titanium driver in the US in 94, and so on. They're listed on my web sites if you are interested. If you would like some verification of my knowledge, you can ask any of the equipment editors for any of the game's major publications what they think of the info I give them when they call - they talk to all the game's technical experts so they've had many chances to compare what I tell them to what they hear from the others. Call 'em and ask what they think of my knowledge.

I learned a long time ago in my work that real custom fitting, meaning building the set from scratch to have every possible specification matched as accurately as possible to each golfer's size/strength/athletic ability/swing characteristics, is better for ALL golfers than simply buying a standard made set off the rack. I have said this countless times - there is nothing wrong with the clubhead, shaft, and grip quality of the big brand name companies. I know that because in some of my past work I have been a paid consultant for two foundries who produced heads for Taylor Made, Mizuno, Nike, Wilson, etc - so I have seen first hand that their quality is good. These foundries hired me to help them stay up on the latest materials, solve manufacturing problems and help them get a little better at making the heads for their golf company customers because they liked the suggestions I would make when I was sheparding my own designs through their factories.

The only thing wrong about the OEMs is that their primary business model is to make standard clubs to sell off the rack in a "one size fits all" manner. Golfers who think that getting to choose a shaft flex you have no idea how stiff/flexible the letter on the shaft says it is within that one model of a shaft, or golfers who think choosing a driver loft between 8.5 and 11* is 'custom fitting', then they are very ill-informed about what REAL custom fitting is and what it really can do for all golfers.

Think about this for a second. . . .

Golf is the only "bat and ball sport" whose participants cannot buy their "bats" off the rack in a custom fit form to match their swing and manner of play. Look at baseball/softball bats. You head into any top sporting goods store and within each brand and model of bat, you will see a myriad of different LENGTHS, different WEIGHTS, different HANDLE DIAMETERS - bats are not all the same length/weight/grip size because the bat makers and the retailers all know people who shop for a bat won't and can't play with the same specs. Tennis too - all high quality brand name rackets are sold in different grip sizes and with no strings - again because the racket makers and retailers know that tennis players have to choose the right grip size, their preferred string type and the right string tension for their swing and how they play.

But not golf - despite the fact golfers come in all sizes, strengths, level of athletic ability and most of all, different swing characteristics. The reason you don't see in golf clubs what you do in bats and rackets is because we golfers have to buy and use 14 clubs, not ONE. From a pure business standpoint, can you imagine what a hassle it would be for the club companies to have to forecast, make, stock and ship the same club model but in different lengths, different weights, different face angles, different grip sizes, etc etc - and likewise can you imagine the retailers having to stock and display all these custom variations in 8 to 10 different brands?? Standard, one size fits all is the way it has to be done for convenience and all the marketing is aimed to tell golfers what pros use these clubs and how great they are right off the rack - and millions of golfers buy into that despite the fact they would play better and more consistently if they were truly custom fit.

The reason you do not see more component designs on tour or in fellow golfers' bags is because no component company makes the profit or volume to accumulate $162,000,000 in three years with which to market and sway public opinion. Most retailers of golf clubs do not want to have the mess of doing their own assembly, much less spend that much time building sets for golfers when they can just stock standard clubs that have real demand generated by $162,000,000 times 4 or 5 spent over three years. An OEM makes 5 times the profit on each standard driver they sell to a retail shop that a component company makes selling a driver HEAD in "ones and twos" to individuals who range from the best clubmakers on the planet to people who are lucky to know what end of the shaft to install in the head.

In my last position, I busted my chops trying to get the company to let me set up training and custom fitting programs for their retail division. They said no because of several reasons, 1) we only make 20-25% profit on each OEM club we sell so we cannot allow the sales staff to take more than 10-15 mins to make the sale, 2) we can't feature custom fitting because it takes too long for the profit it generates and besides, the OEMs would get mad at us for competing with them, 3) the sales people turnover is too great to merit spending the time/money to train them like that. Kinda sad, eh? And those are the people that sell many of you the golf clubs with which you play. Yes, there are a few retailers of golf clubs who do a fine job training and servicing their customers. But the operative word is few, not many because the emphasis today is more about sales than making sure every golfer walks out with the best clubs for THEIR game.

Sorry for the length of this. As I said, I am very passionate about this field and I really want to help golfers get the best for their game and for their money. Best advice I have is to go to amazon.com, Borders, Barnes&Noble and get a copy of The Search for the Perfect Golf Club or the other new one about drivers. Read it. You won't see "sales speak" or "marketing hype" in there and any of the advice I give in there can be done with an OEM club if you wish. All I care about is that golfers realize the facts of life about golf clubs and then go make an informed buying decision. Yes, I am very much PRO-CUSTOM FITTING because 30+ yrs of watching and working with golfers tells me GOOD custom fitting is indisputably better than standard off the rack when the goal is for the golfer to spend his/her money wisely and end up with a set that truly can offset some of the negatives in their swing and accent the positives.

But don't assume that a golf club is good for you just because the company is huge, or you see it in a tour players' bag, or you see it in ads and on TV. Please take the time to learn a little about the technology of how clubs really work for different swings - if you do you will be happier with your purchases and enjoy the game a little more. And if you have questions about things that confuse you, email me and I will be happy to offer the pros and cons from facts, not hype or marketing.

Later on in the thread, BSG members fell on both sides of the conversation. The most interesting parts were those who called for the BSG proprietors to reveal their clubmaking credentials.

A shit-storm ensued, lots of back and forth, Todd later saying he was misquoted in the insider area (of course after he modified the original it does appear that he was misquoted). The end result of it all is what happens when people start shaking the table that the BSG house-of-cards is built on top of; the thread was deleted and anyone who asked about it in another thread was either suspended or banned. More good, free-thinking people kicked off of BSG and only the koolaid-drinking sheep left behind.

They will be exposed someday for what they are, people who are out to screw you for equipment that is very likely not fit right for your game.

http://compgolfer.com/2006/11/bombsquadgolf_post_of_the_week.html